Model year: 2023-2024
Sidecut: 125-72-103
Size: 178
Radius: 16.4 m
Technology: wood core, full sidewall, two sheets of metal, tip rocker, Tailored Carbon Tips
Note: the 2024-2025 Peregrine 72 is exactly the same ski. Only the name and print are different.
About this ski
The Deacon skis were first introduced by Völkl for the 2018-2019 season. After a few years, they redesigned most of them. Last year, they launched this Deacon 72, the narrowest in the line. No more UVO (that dampening ‘puck’ on the front of the ski to help prevent tip chatter), but still substantial tip rocker. Not so much in splay (the amount the tip comes off the snow in terms of hight), but certainly in terms of length of the rocker.
This means that when skiing flat, about 20 cm of the ski don’t necessarily touch the snow. This could cause tip chatter (wind getting under the tip, making it flap and feel unstable). Völkl have incorporated their Tailored Carbon Tips technology in this ski (in most skis, in fact). It just means carbon stringers in the rockered tip to prevent this tip chatter. And they do their job.
Allround
The previous version of this ski (Deacon 74) needed extreme edge angles to hook on and pull you into a carved turn. Actually, they were only fun in chop and bumps. This new ski, however, hooks up immediately, even when skiing lazily with hardly any technical input. The beauty is, though, that it kind of ‘feels’ what you want to do with it. Cruise around? No problem. Get some high-energy carves in? Let’s do it! Glide to the next coffee break watching the kids having fun? Sure!
Not just allround in terms of energy needed and returned – this ski performs equally well on icy, wind-bashed steep slopes (the grip is tenacious and immediate, despite the rocker) as it does in 20 cm of powder on top of your groomer. In bumps – hard or soft – it is brilliant and fun, helping you instead of kicking your backside. Don’t expect freeride float, of course. But for a 72 mm carving ski with the level of precision and performance that you would normally find in something called ‘Ractiger’, ‘Redster’ or ‘Firebird’, the versatility of this ski is phenomenal. It comes in lengths from 158 to 178, so it is truly unisex as well.
Conclusion
The most allround groomer ski out there. Precision and power if you want it, confidence-inspiring stability with no effort at all, crazy good on the hardest icy runs and in pow-on-groomers too, and for the widest possible range of skiers in terms of size, style, and ability level (intermediate and up). This is hard to beat. It comes in a few colors now.
Characteristics
| Playful |  | Stable |
| Forgiving |  | Punishing |
| Lively |  | Damp |
| Skidding | | Carving |
| Low speed | | High speed |
| Short turn | | Long turn |
| Soft snow | | Hard snow |
Really interesting. Could you say something about lengte. Seen the purpose I assume chin height?
I don’t think sizing skis in relation to one’s own body length is the way to go (even though this is still done a lot, especially in rental shops, with beginners and kids). In relation to weight, ability level, speed and style – yes.
In the case of this ski: go for the radius that you want. Stability is not an issue, not even in shorter lengths. That doesn’t mean stability is the same in the longest length as it is in the shortest. I’m just saying that in this segment, stability is not a thing to worry about.
Hi Gigi
Can you compare the deacon 72 to the 76?
Would the latter add even more versatility due to its width?
Nice review. Looks like a total winner!
The 76’s width is not a gamechanger in any way. Why you would get the 76 instead of the 72 would be the larger radius and a bit more serious character (of the 76).
Heya gigi, time for me to “retire” my dynastar speedzone 14s after 120 odd ski days (i got them on your recommendation).
Did you also test these in shorter lengths or only 1m78? Reason i am asking is i have a pair of longer radius skis (fischer the curv gt in 1m82).. and these ski significantly different depending on the length you ski.
Also wondering if this one is closer to the 24 pro or the master.
I also tested the 173 length, which is a bit more towards ‘short radius’ skis in feel and responsiveness. Compared to a Curv GT, both 173 and 178 length Deacon 72s feel like ‘shorter radius’. The difference between the 173 and 178 length is less significant than the difference between the 178 Deacon 72 and the Curv GT (even though on paper the Curv GT’s radius seems only slightly longer).
In short: the Deacon 72 is substantially more towards shorter turn skis, and more versatile than most consumer SL skis. A difference between the Deacon 72 and the Deacon 72 Pro is the heavier construction and Marker Piston plate in the Pro version, making it a slightly stronger ski than the Curv GT, despite the shorter radius. The Pro is significantly stronger in feel (and less playful and with less ease of handling on lower speeds) compared to the regular Deacon 72.
I hope this helps. For a full advice, please use this page: https://gigiski.com/advice/
Heya Gijs, just a quick follow up.
I’ve now skied/tested the deavon 72 master. Not in ideal circumstances (it has been dumping were i live in the dolomites since friday). So parts knee high snow parts 15-20 cm fresh on prepped pistes, part mogulled out, cut up crut.
They performed marvelously. Of course attention in the deeper stuff, but everything else very good. As you said skis shorter than its radius, and it just felt like a very easy ski, but then in a cut up steeper section you start pushing and you get a lot of energy back playing with aft balance end of turn.
Still need to test them on snow that doesnt push back (hard), but at least in more all mountain circumstances they perform much better than expected. Totally follow your review.
I’d be curious to hear how Deacon 72 compares to Head e-Magnum, any thoughts on that?
There is a full review of the rally on this site, so you can compare yourself as well.
My conclusion would be that the Deacon has much more performance genes than the current e-Rally had. Both very allround in terms of turn shapes etc, but the level of energy is quite different. The Deacon is much more performant than the e-Rally.
Thanks Gigi, I’ll check it out. I would’ve thought the e-Magnum is better comparison point than e-Rally due to the same width though.
The e-Magnum is a bit less stable or performant than the e-Rally. Forget the measurement when comparing the Supershapes to the Deacons; the measurements may be the only thing they share. It’s the over-all feel, energy, character that is very different.
Hello, have you also tried the Nordic multirace? I’m undecided between the 2
The Nordica Multigara you mean? Review is coming in the next few weeks.
Si, grazie!
Thanks for this very interesting review!
I think I want this ski, but I’m in doubt about sizing. I’m coming off an old pair of Atomic SX 11 Race oriented ski. Skis are 176cm in length, waist 68, radius 17m.
I’m an experienced skier, can get down any type of piste with decent speed. I can carve the blue pistes, but red ones I end up skidding a lot. Or just straight line and break at the end…
I want to improve my carving and really learn to hang into the carve, getting my body down. I figured this might be easier to learn on a bit easier to handle ski with a shorter length and radius so that I’m not gaining too much speed on the red pistes and can stay carving instead of skidding.
Do you think the 173cm Deacon 72 would work to progress my carving skills or would you recommend another size? I’m 85kg and 186cm tall.
For a skier your size and ability, I would suggest the 178 length. The ski’s will help you to carve. If you want a carve-only ski, I suggest you find another ski rather than a different size of this ski.
In which case I would end up with almost the same radius and lenght as my current skis.
Making me realize that it’s maybe not new skis I’m looking for, but rather trying to improve my carving skills on my current.
Thanks for your prompt response!
Thanks for a great review!
It actually made me want this ski.
Im very unsure about the size, since the gaps are only 5cm. Im 173 tall and about 82kg. Advanced skier, skiing all slopes, but mostly only gromed slopes. The 168 size looks good but the turnradius i quite short 14,5.
How do you suggest i should think?
They’re stable AND manageable in all lengths for any advanced skier. So choose your preferred radius, I would suggest. If I were to spend your money for you, I would buy the 173 length based on the information provided.
Great review!
I’m 173 cm tall and about 64-65 kg, advanced skier, skiing all slopes and variable conditions.
I’m split between the 168 and 173 lengths.
If you were to spend my money, which length would you buy?
I would pick the radius, that then corresponds with a ski length. Both lengths offer plenty of stabililty, none over them will be ’too much’. So pick your radius I would say.
Any idea of the base and edge angles of this ski. I would like to tune them myself.
I am not quite sure, but I think it would be 0.75 to 1.0 on the base and 2 degrees on the edge.
Ha Gijs,
Fijne review!
Ik ben mezelf aan het oriënteren op nieuwe ski’s. De eerste vraag in reactie op deze review: zijn de peregrine 72 exact dezelfde ski’s dan de deacon 72?
Ik twijfel op dit moment nog tussen een aantal ski’s, waaronder de Fischer RC one 78 gt die ik betaalbaar op de kop kan tikken, met als alternatieven de Atomic q7, k2 disruption 78ti of toch de peregrine 72. Ik ben een vergevorderde skiër en op zoek naar een allround piste ski voor multiturns, die me ook wel een beetje uit kan dagen, maar ook bij mindere piste condities niet meteen door de mand valt/ overeind blijft. Vandaar bijvoorbeeld ook mijn oog op de 78mm fischers en K2.
Wat zou jij adviseren en waarom?
De Peregrine 72 en Deacon 72 zijn inderdaad exact dezelfde ski. Voor een goed advies vul je deze pagina in: https://gigiski.com/advice/
Misschien nog goed om te vermelden is dat er vorig jaar in de verhuur ook veel Deacons 72 beschikbaar waren vorig seizoen. In Tignes stonden deze bij vele Intersports…
Deze verhuurski heeft een totaal andere skiopbouw dan de hier geteste… De verhuurski is oa te herkennen aan de cap-constructie. Goed om op te letten dus als je denkt een interessante deal te vinden van de hier geteste variant.
—
It might be worth mentioning that there were also many Deacons 72 available for rent last season. In Tignes, these were available at many Intersports…
This rental ski has a completely different ski construction than the one tested here… The rental ski can be recognized by the cap construction, among other things. So it’s good to pay attention to it if you think you’ll find an interesting deal. Because it isn’t 🙂
You’re talking about the Deacon 7.2 I think. Agreed, totally different skis. That’s why there’s a . in there…
Could be… i didnt notice. Were the graphics the same? Because they looked the same (Grey blue with pink)
Yes, looks pretty similar, the colors at least.
Hi Gigi,
Thanks for sharing this review. I bought a pair of these on sale during the summer based in part on your review, and I finally had the chance to try them out today. I’m very happy with them. At low speed, making the short feathered “ski instructor-style” turns was so easy it felt automatic. The tips never felt hooky, but nevertheless initiated instantly. I thought you were being hyperbolic but especially when skiing slowly it really does feel like they just know what you want them to do. They don’t have as much mass as my old skis, but they never felt unstable, even when the groomers got chopped up (although I’m still shaking off early season rust so I didn’t try skiing very fast). They were also surprisingly easy to ski in the soft moguls that formed in the afternoon – the tips planed right up on top of the snow piles, and the skis felt compliant, predictable, and precise all at the same time.
There are a few characteristics that are going to take some getting used to. They’re much more sensitive to fore-aft balance in a carve than I’m used to. The tails felt very soft to me; I’m used to getting more feedback from them. These two points were especially apparent on my first few runs as I’m recovering from the rustiness of the offseason. And they don’t have that bouncy camber feeling underfoot – when in a carve it almost felt like the sole of my boot was pressing directly against the snow without a ski in between, if that makes sense. But overall, I’m very happy I landed on these.
Thanks for maintaining the site; it is a great resource!
Wat een heerlijke review! Na 20! jaar zijn de head XRC 1400i’s superchips aan vervanging toe (177 cm). Een pittige ski die het beste rendeert op snelheid en eerder neigt naar race (weliswaar officieel een kleinere radius); beperkt vergevingsgezind. Ik ben nu gevallen op de Deacon (Peregrine) 72 van Volkl. mede dankzij deze review. Maar welke lengte is het meest geschikt? Ik ben een gevorderde skiër (lees 2 weekjes per jaar voor een jaar of 30). Ik ski sportief en dat wil ik graag blijven doen (en ook wel agressief). Alleen nu wil ik ook op steilere pistes (zwart) wat kleinere bochten kunnen skiën in plaats van “gedwongen” worden om snel breed, race/hard te gaan. En de komende jaren zal ik meer met de kleine kinderen gaan skieen die nu voor de eerste jaren op les gaan. Ik twijfel tussen de 173 cm skiset (met een wat kleinere radius) of de 178 cm skiset ( die zich wellicht meer leent voor sportief en carven). Ik ben 184 cm lang en 82 kilo. Wie heeft de gouden tip?
Kies de radius die je graag wil. 173 kan prima.
Is er verschil in de deacon 72 master en de deacon 72?
Of is deze hetzelfde? Welke heb je getest?
De Master (zowel van de Deacon als van de huidige Peregrine 72) heeft een stijvere kern en een raceplaat, dus is in zijn geheel een stuk stijver. Dit review gaat over de ‘gewone’ Deacon/Peregrin 72 (dus niet de ‘master’ – als dat zo was geweest had het wel in de titel gestaan).